Recently, there has been a rise in cases where cybercriminals use fabricated stories to spread fake news about cryptocurrency thefts.
One such incident involved a claim by a user who reported losing $50,000 after using a suspicious exchange platform. According to the user, instead of receiving genuine cryptocurrency, they were given so-called “flash cryptocurrency” in the form of USDC, allegedly displayed on well-known exchanges.
However, after conducting our investigation, we found that the entire story was carefully fabricated and had no basis in reality.
❓ What Was the Alleged Scheme?The user alleged that, trusting the exchange platform, they purchased cryptocurrency, which appeared on their balance in the web version of Binance. However, no actual transaction occurred, and the coins turned out to be invalid.
The scheme unfolded as follows:
- Fake Exchange: The user came across an online platform offering “flash cryptocurrency.” This type of scam creates the illusion of a cryptocurrency transfer, while the funds remain in the hands of the scammers.
- Test Purchase: To verify the platform’s legitimacy, the user made a small test purchase. This common tactic gives victims a false sense of security and trust in the platform.
- Falsified Display: After purchasing the “flash cryptocurrency,” the user saw the balance displayed on their Binance account in the web version. However, the cryptocurrency never entered the blockchain, and the displayed balance was falsified by the scammers.
🛠️ How Does Flash Cryptocurrency Fraud Work?“Flash cryptocurrency” refers to fictitious coins that resemble real ones and are temporarily displayed in a wallet or on an exchange balance. Scammers use these fake coins to deceive victims into making additional transactions or transferring funds. These coins eventually disappear, as they do not actually exist on the blockchain.
This case serves as a warning to users who are unfamiliar with the technical aspects of cryptocurrencies. Always verify the reliability of a platform and use only trusted exchanges and wallets for transactions.
🔎 Match Systems Investigation: Identifying DiscrepanciesWe carefully analyzed the situation and concluded that this is yet another fake scheme. After examining the transactions mentioned in the story, we identified the following inconsistencies:1. ❌ Absence of Transactions at the Specified Addresses.The first notable issue is the discrepancy in the transaction data. The provided screenshot (Image 1) shows a transaction allegedly occurring on June 20, 2024, from the sender address
0x22b035546Bb6ff425d2aC76cdFEFC52c4518cb74. This address belongs to the Bybit hot wallet (Image 2). However, no transactions matching the claimed history occurred from this address on the specified date.